In a comment to another post I said that I would post a YouTube of the segment of the July 3, 2007 meeting at which Trustee Judy Sigwalt and Paul Humpfer disagree on what part if any Humpfer played in the financial situation of this Village. Well, staying true to my promise, I am including that segment of the Village board meeting that involves this information. You can view this YouTube by clicking on the arrow on the picture.
Some Questions: “Pay To Play”
Now keep in mind that when Paul Humpfer was doing this “financial work” for the Village, he was doing it without pay and without legal authorization. What was the benefit that he gained? He was appointed to the Village board as a trustee, not once, but twice. He was reappointed after losing the election in 2005. Why? He was appointed to chair the Audit and Finance Commission. This was not my choice, but was forced upon me by the majority on the board.
You must ask yourself a few very important questions. Why was Paul Humpfer selected over anyone else to do this work? Why couldn’t the Village “hire” a competent Finance Director to do this work? Why was the Village paying a Finance Director if they couldn’t do the job? Mr. Bob Simpson was hired as a consultant to do the work. Why didn’t the Village hire Humpfer to do this financial work if only he and he alone was qualified to do this job? Why would Humpfer do this for free?
None of this makes any sense. To me, a former auditor with the state of Illinois for 28 years, I say something is terribly wrong with this situation on several levels.
Trustee Judy Sigwalt said that “she found Paul Humpfer.” Where did she find him?
In a letter written by Paul Humpfer’s ex-wife, Jackie Humpfer, she claims that Paul Humpfer worked on the Village finances at their home, with the following people present, Trustee, Judy Sigwalt, Former Village President, Mark Boettger and Former County Board Member, Don Rage. This letter by Jackie Humpfer was signed on December 13, 2007. I have the letter, so does the Kane County State’s Attorney. None of these people that former Mrs. Humpfer has identified were involved with the Village finances. Trustee Sigwalt claims that Paul Humpfer worked with former and present Finance Directors. A couple more questions must be asked. Why would our current Finance Director need the “help” of Paul Humpfer to do her job? By who’s authority does Paul Humpfer help with the finances of this Village. He certainly isn’t doing it with my consent or blessing. I do not believe that our current Finance Director needs Humpfer’s help to do her job. So what is really going on here?
These are all fair questions, that deserve real answers. NO TRUSTEE SHOULD BE DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH DOING “FINANCIAL WORK ON OUR VILLAGE FINANCE RECORDS. NO RESIDENT OF THIS VILLAGE SHOULD BE DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH THE FINANCES OF OUR VILLAGE. Was this “pay to play” on the part of the Village and Paul Humpfer? Was he promised a trustee position if he did the work? Trustee Sigwalt says that what Humpfer did was worth $100K, I think we have a governor of Illinois being asked those same type of questions right now by a federal prosecutor. However this seems to be true “quid pro quo”. Humpfer provided services and the Village received some “help” with its finances. Humpfer then was appointed to a trustee position. Was more than just a trustee’s position given in this case? Was money also given? A trustee position in the wrong hands can be very lucrative.
Was that an FBI agent applauding at the end of Sigwalt’s statement?
Will anyone respond to this? Let’s see…